#critical AI literacy

critical AI literacy

2 篇論文

Graduate readers and a supervisor compare an annotated article's results table with a laptop critique while recording evidence checks.

期刊論文2026

Postgraduate readers used AI critiques in different ways, with original-source checking remaining essential

Haoming Lin, Wei Wei, Bin Zou, Ying Zheng

Discover Computing

An observational study followed 53 postgraduate readers as they revised critiques of academic articles using generated reviews, a chatbot and the original paper. Screen recordings and interviews revealed different patterns of reliance, re-reading and dialogue that varied with the perceived difficulty of the task. The study explains how AI-supported reading can unfold, but without a non-AI comparison or independent transfer assessment it does not establish that the tool improved critical-reading ability.

academic readingcritical AI literacymetacognition

閱讀 500 字摘要 →

An instructor and two engineering students compare an assistive-device block diagram with a research page containing a crossed-out claim and a corrected statement.

期刊論文2025

期刊論文 150

An engineering module taught students to audit AI claims before using them in design work

Christine E. King, Beth A. Lopour

Biomedical Engineering Education

A biomedical engineering course asked students to verify ChatGPT's claims against research literature and revise an AI-generated device proposal with tracked changes. Thirty-one of 68 students answered the evaluation survey, reporting better awareness of limitations and less automatic trust. Project reflections showed selective use, especially for brainstorming. This teaching report offers a concrete assessment design, but it did not demonstrate a causal improvement in critical-thinking ability or student learning outcomes.

engineering educationcritical AI literacysource verification

閱讀 500 字摘要 →