#AI evaluation

एआई मूल्यांकन

6 पेपर

एक लेखन प्रशिक्षक और दो विश्वविद्यालय शिक्षार्थी बदलते संशोधन प्राथमिकताओं के बीच एक संयमित दृश्य लिंक के साथ एक बड़े सेमिनार टेबल पर लगातार एनोटेटेड पैराग्राफ ड्राफ्ट की तुलना करते हैं

कॉन्फ्रेंस पेपर2026

सम्मेलन-पत्र: FeedType जाँचता है कि लेखन के संशोधन के साथ AI प्रतिक्रिया का केंद्र कैसे बदलता है

Norah Almousa, Shayan Peyghambari Oskoui, Raquel Coelho, Gayle Rogers, Xiang Lorraine Li, Diane Litman

Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Full Papers

FeedType विश्वविद्यालय स्तर के लेखन पाठ्यक्रमों, छह भाषा मॉडलों और तीन प्रॉम्प्ट देने की रणनीतियों में प्रतिक्रिया के केंद्र की तुलना करता है। मॉडलों ने कई श्रेणियाँ शामिल कीं, लेकिन उनका वितरण और अनुकूलन शिक्षकों से पूरी तरह मेल नहीं खाया। अध्ययन प्रतिक्रिया की जाँच के लिए एक बेंचमार्क देता है; यह विद्यार्थियों के लेखन में सुधार सिद्ध नहीं करता।

लेखन पर प्रतिक्रियाशैक्षणिक अनुकूलताFeedType

500-शब्द सार पढ़ें →

A South Asian female lecturer and a White male university student examine two differently annotated statistics feedback sheets beside a hand-drawn confidence-interval diagram

जर्नल पेपर2026

जर्नल पेपर 216

Students’ feedback ratings reflected source credibility without consistently matching expert judgments

Tanya Nazaretsky, Hagit Gabbay, Tanja Käser

Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence

Researchers compared human and AI feedback on 979 responses from six university STEM courses, then examined ratings from 472 students. Expert analysis found broadly similar pedagogical quality, while students’ judgments were associated with their views of the source’s credibility. The study did not measure feedback uptake or learning gains. For educators, it raises a practical question: how can students justify an evaluation of advice before deciding whether to use it?

feedback literacysource credibilityhigher education

500-शब्द सार पढ़ें →

$A student explains equivalent fraction bars to a listening teacher and classmate, with a tablet set aside.$

कॉन्फ्रेंस पेपर2025

कॉन्फ्रेंस पेपर 208

Nonstandard English and the Automated Scoring of Open-Ended Math Problems

Abubakir Siedahmed, Jaclyn Ocumpaugh, Zelda Ferris, Dinesh Kodwani, Neil Heffernan, Eamon Worden

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Educational Data Mining

A study of 394 authentic mathematics responses examined how GPT-4o scores language associated with African American Vernacular English. Changing one targeted dialect feature did not significantly alter scores, while changing the grading prompt did. The latter contrast also changed rubric wording, so it cannot cleanly establish that a dialect instruction removed bias. The study makes a useful case for testing content scoring carefully, with language variation and mathematical reasoning evaluated separately.

Mathematics AssessmentEducational EquityAI Evaluation

500-शब्द सार पढ़ें →

A mathematics lecturer and peer discuss a university student's induction proof beside a laptop showing feedback on the next step.

कॉन्फ्रेंस पेपर2026

कॉन्फ्रेंस पेपर 206

LeanTutor: Towards a Verified AI Mathematical Proof Tutor

Manooshree Patel, Rayna Bhattacharyya, Thomas Lu, Arnav Mehta, Niels Voss, Narges Norouzi, Gireeja Ranade

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

LeanTutor connects a language model to the Lean theorem prover to support mathematical proof feedback. Its technical evaluation shows promising hints on a small selected benchmark, but also exposes a crucial boundary: a verifier can check the formal proof only after the learner's words have been translated correctly. The study did not test classroom learning, and feedback evaluation excluded failed translations. It is an early system design with explicit limitations, not a validated replacement for mathematics instruction.

Mathematics EducationIntelligent TutoringFormal Verification

500-शब्द सार पढ़ें →

A lecturer, research assistant and postgraduate compare two concept explanations and a table of points to check while recording revision notes.

नीति / नैतिकता28 सित॰ 2026

नीति / नैतिकता 183

Product news: Claude Sonnet 5.5 targets faster everyday work, with task boundaries still central to educational use

Anthropic

AI Product and Learning Report

Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, positioning it as a faster, lower-cost complement to Opus 5.5 for well-defined work. The company reports improvements in coding, documents, and communication, with efficiency gains dependent on the task. OpenAI's recently released GPT-6 Sol and Luna and Gemini's course-connected support provide context. Educational teams should evaluate the work they actually need, including the review required before a draft becomes usable.

product newsClaude Sonnet 5.5model selection

500-शब्द सार पढ़ें →

An education researcher and a developer compare an annotated geometry lesson with code and a verification diagram on a laptop in a university studio

नीति / नैतिकता22 सित॰ 2026

नीति / नैतिकता 171

Product news: Claude Opus 5.5 brings lower-cost research workflows and clearer collaboration

Anthropic

AI Product and Learning Report

Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5 on September 22, emphasizing stronger coding and knowledge work, clearer communication, and lower operating costs. The same day's GPT-6 Sol and Luna launch broadened the choice of affordable models, while Gemini's established Guided Learning tools offered a contrasting educational purpose. For universities, the opportunity is to compare research workflows carefully while keeping model performance, completed artifacts, and student learning as separate outcomes.

product newsClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Sol

500-शब्द सार पढ़ें →